I was recently confronted with a situation that has still left its mark on me. A member of a gay mens' chat group sponsored by a GLBT senior center made statements such as "Those with AIDS deserve what happens to them" "I would be a picket protesting Gay Pride parades with all those drag queens and guys in leather with their asses exposed". While others in the group advised me to ignore this "jerk", I couldn't. The group facilitator and executive director focused on me as the messenger of this news, though I never confronted the man in the group. The administrators expressed that everyone had the right to express their opinions. I made it clear that this man's free speech was in direct opposition to the mission statement of the organization to "provide a positive image of LGBT people" and to offer a safe and supportive place for LGBT seniors. I stopped attending the chat group and declined my services as a volunteer as an RN, something I was looking forward to. I re-read your writing on aggrandized power in Golden Men realizing I couldn't give up my power because administrators couldn't or wouldn't come up with a way to address homophobic speech other than to claim political correctness. I noticed a difference existed between myself and the group members and administrators. I just turned 60 and most of these men were older. I was at Stonewall, became a nurse to take care of my brothers when I found I had escaped the plague of AIDS. Tolerance never was nor is something I choose. I am accepted or not for who I am and always have been because I have never allowed someone to take my power or ask me to limit it for whatever reason. Is this generational difference going to mean I will now have to battle homophobia, internalized or blatant, with my older brothers? Is there a place for a life-long activist to "retire", discuss differing opinions, without having to go back to the very beginning, where acceptance is the norm and tolerance is an evolutionary step now applicable to the non-gay world in their struggle?
|